<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Army OKs $248M in barracks repairs, but housing still aging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://texasfred.net/archives/1151/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://texasfred.net/archives/1151</link>
	<description>No Holds Barred: News Opinion Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TexasFred</title>
		<link>http://texasfred.net/archives/1151/comment-page-1#comment-9442</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasFred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 02:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://texasfred.net/?p=1151#comment-9442</guid>
		<description>daveb, Thanks for stopping by, comments like this are always welcome...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>daveb, Thanks for stopping by, comments like this are always welcome&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveb</title>
		<link>http://texasfred.net/archives/1151/comment-page-1#comment-9441</link>
		<dc:creator>daveb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 02:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://texasfred.net/?p=1151#comment-9441</guid>
		<description>I agree with BobF. Luckly the on post family housing is now private contract with a civilian contractor. The money that was at one time taken away from the soldier when they moved into housing is now kept avaiable to take care of the housing. Before this the Dept. of the Army could use the money for what ever they saw fit. The on post single soldier barracks from what I have seen is not that bad. I have seen barracks taken down here at Fort Hood and assume that new ones will replace them. I am sure that there are substandard barracks here and have seen ones at Sill and Lee. This is my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with BobF. Luckly the on post family housing is now private contract with a civilian contractor. The money that was at one time taken away from the soldier when they moved into housing is now kept avaiable to take care of the housing. Before this the Dept. of the Army could use the money for what ever they saw fit. The on post single soldier barracks from what I have seen is not that bad. I have seen barracks taken down here at Fort Hood and assume that new ones will replace them. I am sure that there are substandard barracks here and have seen ones at Sill and Lee. This is my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobF</title>
		<link>http://texasfred.net/archives/1151/comment-page-1#comment-9056</link>
		<dc:creator>BobF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://texasfred.net/?p=1151#comment-9056</guid>
		<description>I put the blame for this on the senior Army leadership.   It doesn&#039;t have anything to do with who&#039;s in the White House or SecDef.  Senior leadership chose to spend their money on weapons systems rather than upgrade their infrastructure.   Many of these weapons systems were junk and never made it to the field but someone got a nice position with that defense contractor when they retired.  Meanwhile, the troops live in substandard conditions here stateside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put the blame for this on the senior Army leadership.   It doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with who&#8217;s in the White House or SecDef.  Senior leadership chose to spend their money on weapons systems rather than upgrade their infrastructure.   Many of these weapons systems were junk and never made it to the field but someone got a nice position with that defense contractor when they retired.  Meanwhile, the troops live in substandard conditions here stateside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
