<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Holds Video Conference With Iraqis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://texasfred.net/archives/241/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://texasfred.net/archives/241</link>
	<description>News Opinion Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:09:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panhandle Poet</title>
		<link>http://texasfred.net/archives/241/comment-page-1#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Panhandle Poet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://texasfred.net/archives/241#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>Excellent point about the Islamic attitude toward our female Secretary of State.  I&#039;m not certain it would make any difference though if we had a male Secty of State if they are non-Muslim.  As Infidels, we mean nothing to them.  They can lie, cheat and steal in regards to Infidels and it is Allah&#039;s will.  Conversely, if we had a Muslim Secty of State, we couldn&#039;t trust him (it wouldn&#039;t be a her).  So, conclusion is, it is a no-win situation when dealing with Islamic countries by diplomacy.  The only diplomacy they understand is force.  The one with the biggest army/whatever wins until the next &quot;biggest&quot; comes along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point about the Islamic attitude toward our female Secretary of State.  I&#8217;m not certain it would make any difference though if we had a male Secty of State if they are non-Muslim.  As Infidels, we mean nothing to them.  They can lie, cheat and steal in regards to Infidels and it is Allah&#8217;s will.  Conversely, if we had a Muslim Secty of State, we couldn&#8217;t trust him (it wouldn&#8217;t be a her).  So, conclusion is, it is a no-win situation when dealing with Islamic countries by diplomacy.  The only diplomacy they understand is force.  The one with the biggest army/whatever wins until the next &#8220;biggest&#8221; comes along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranando</title>
		<link>http://texasfred.net/archives/241/comment-page-1#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://texasfred.net/archives/241#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>WTF is this shit?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070618/ts_nm/iraq_usa_states_dc_2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Iraq now ranked second among world&#039;s failed states &lt;/a&gt;

I realize that, &quot;Fund for Peace&quot; is involved in this report but still it&#039;s disturbing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF is this shit?</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070618/ts_nm/iraq_usa_states_dc_2" rel="nofollow">Iraq now ranked second among world&#8217;s failed states </a></p>
<p>I realize that, &#8220;Fund for Peace&#8221; is involved in this report but still it&#8217;s disturbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

