Comments on: 1,200 protest California’s gay-marriage ban at Dallas City Hall

By: cary - Botan Ichihara

cary - Botan Ichihara — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:37:33 +0000

Correct me if I’m wrong:

52% of Californians do not want to recognize “gay marriage” in their state, and that is considered “unacceptable” and the community affected wants to reverse the result, which would be “acceptable”?

53% of voters DO want Obama to lead them, and that’s “acceptable” and if the community affected (conservatives) want the result reversed that would be “unacceptable”?

Texas is just a little bit out of California’s jurisdiction – what good is protesting a California election result in Texas?

Arizona and Florida have also passed constitutional amendments to not recognize “gay marriage” yet no one seems to be protesting the AZ and FL votes? What, no gay communities in those states?

Boy, am I confused.

By: TexasFred

TexasFred — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:07:03 +0000

By: TexasFred

TexasFred — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:27:37 +0000

So Democracy isn’t acceptable by the Gay community in California and elsewhere. Instead they wish to force their views upon others.

Oh man, that is THE BEST line of the thread!!

By: Basti

Basti — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:09:49 +0000

I was raised a Christian (A Methodist) and while I’m long fallen away I despise queers.

Think about it! Who wants to wake in bed with another guy with 5 o’clock shadow!

Queers are perverse and billions of dollars have been spent to fight AIDS a condition that was spread all over the world and mostly by queers!

By: Carl

Carl — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 09:00:27 +0000

So Democracy isn’t acceptable by the Gay community in California and elsewhere. Instead they wish to force their views upon others. Hmmm…isn’t that what they’ve been accusing Christians of doing for years?

Pot…kettle…black…

The people have spoken against gay marriage and now the proponents demand the courts overturn what the people wanted. Expect the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to overstep their boundaries once again as the most liberal court in the land to legislate from the bench. And expect them to be overruled once again. Too bad those appeals court justices can’t be removed for incompentence. When your decisions get overturned by a higher court so many times, that is a clue that they are incompentent and should be removed. If a group of doctors had a high death rate, would they be allowed to practice medicine?

By: Patrick Sperry

Patrick Sperry — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:06:05 +0000

Why can’t we just nuke say… Libya or Iran, or both, and send all the queers there?

By: Robert

Robert — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:48:55 +0000

It’s called taking it up the ass, its called NOT NATURAL, It’s called EXIT ONLY in the rear…. I am so sick of these faggots I can’t hardly stand it. I don’t give a damn what you do in the privacy of your own home, it’s what you subject ME and MY FAMILY to that is the problem.

The basic argument for traditional marriage is:
Marriage in the eyes of GOD, The next step in the GAY/FAGGOT/DIKE agenda is to teach the homosexual lifestyle in schools, then it will be suing the church for not performing weddings between Jack and Jack…

The compromise was found in California, the same sex domestic partner act gave registered same sex partners the same rights as married people… That was not good enough, they want more and this is what happens when they dont get it. I think it’s time to make a stand.