Obama Executive Order 12425 Gives Interpol Immunity and Free Rein Inside The USA

I do, on occasion, bring  my readers a story from one of my blogging friends if I find that post to be one of interest to ALL of us. This is one of those occasions! From my friend and neighbor Lexington Libertarian

Obama Executive Order 12425 Gives Interpol Immunity and Free Rein Inside The USA

Free rein and Diplomatic Immunity for a police force outside the United States??? That amounts to the ability of Interpol to operate inside the United States ABOVE THE LAW.

Obama issues Executive Order 12425, this total remake of our Constitution, by edict without debate or consultation with the American people. HOW DARE HE!

There are multiple reasons why this Obama decision is so deeply disturbing. First, the Obama order reverses a 1983 Reagan administration decision in order to grant Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization, two key privileges. First, Obama has granted Interpol the ability to operate within the territorial limits of the United States without being subject to the same constitutional restraints that apply to all domestic law enforcement agencies such as the FBI. Second, Obama has exempted Interpol’s domestic facilities — including its office within the U.S. Department of Justice — from search and seizure by U.S. authorities and from disclosure of archived documents in response to Freedom of Information Act requests filed by U.S. citizens. Think very carefully about what you just read: Obama has given an international law enforcement organization that is accountable to no other national authority the ability to operate as it pleases within our own borders, and he has freed it from the most basic measure of official transparency and accountability, the FOIA.

As National Review Online’s Andy McCarthy put it, the White House must answer these questions: Why should we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files that will be beyond the scrutiny of Congress, American law enforcement, the media, and the American people? (1)

To begin, Obama is the first president to give an international law enforcement organization like Interpol free rein within the territorial confines of this nation, presumably not excluding the arrest and exportation of Americans to be charged with crimes under international law.

Put simply, this means the Constitution is no longer the supreme law of the land in America. Thanks to Executive Order 12425 , which Obama signed Dec. 16 without explaining why, the supreme law of the land is now arguably whatever Interpol says it is, most likely as directed by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, in conjunction with the United Nations.

Maybe it’s just a bureaucratic snafu. Or perhaps Obama sincerely means to subsume U.S. law to what he views as a morally superior international body.

But what if he simply sees it as an innocuous path to the arrest and prosecution of selected political opponents for “crimes against humanity” in, say, Iraq and Afghanistan? The Far Left would get its pound of Bush-Cheney flesh, while leaving minimal blood on Obama’s hands and giving his defense and foreign policy critics reason to think twice before speaking candidly against him in the future. (2)

President Obama has issued an amendment to Executive Order 12425, designating the international law enforcement agency Interpol as a “public international organization,” thus extending diplomatic immunity to the law enforcement group

The amendment to the Executive Order — which does not need to be put to the senatorial test of “advise and consent” — reads:

“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.”

The text of Section 2(c), which now applies to Interpol states:

“(c) Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable.” (3)

OUTRAGEOUS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, UNPRECEDENTED, MARXIST!

Write and call Your Elected Representatives today!

(1) “Obama Gives Interpol Free Hand In US,” Washington Examiner –
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obama-gives-Interpol-free-hand-in-U_S_-8697583-80291137.html

(2) “What Is Obama Doing?” by Mark Tapscott – http://www.resistnet.com/profiles/blogs/executive-order-12425-obama

(3) “Obama Extends Diplomatic Immunity to Interpol by Executive Order,” The New Media Journal – http://www.infowars.com/obama-extends-diplomatic-immunity-to-interpol-by-executive-order/

This post can be read in full here: Lexington Libertarian

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

This entry was posted in America 1st and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Obama Executive Order 12425 Gives Interpol Immunity and Free Rein Inside The USA

  1. capitalisa says:

    Sent you an email. If I’m wrong about this, I’m wrong. But, I’m not sure that the order means foreign agencies have a free rein here. The part of the order that states American laws are not to be broken are still in the new order.

  2. TexasFred says:

    All I did was post the story, I didn’t offer ANY interpretation..

    I am still in doubt on some of this too, but it’s out there, no one can say I didn’t give it proper attention…

  3. Annie Oakley says:

    “Maybe it’s just a bureaucratic snafu. Or perhaps Obama sincerely means to subsume U.S. law to what he views as a morally superior international body!” BO thinks he is SUPERIOR to the law!!! FRED: Its not a snafu…This isnt the first story Ive read & heard about w/ Interpol and Obama allowing them on US territory. People are closing their eyes to this but Ive been in a group for 3 weeks thats been following this closely. It is happening, anybody who says differently is either aware and trying to calm Americans or they wish to be oblivious to what is happening in our Nation!!

    THEY SHOULD BE AFRAID!! When this is fully enforced we are screwed!!
    I have a bad feeling thats when the gun laws are going to be swiftly put into action as well. Its the beginning of an end to America if they’re not stopped in their tracks!! GOOD POST! GLAD YOU ALLOWED US TO READ WHAT SOMEONE ELSE POSTED, thanks for passing the info to us.

  4. Annie Oakley says:

    We know its not your story, just a repost. We can read and make up our own minds……

  5. TexasFred says:

    Lexington Libertarian is my neighbor, he lives a block from me and we have a lot of political opinions in common…

    Bet that pisses ya off huh Prissy G.?? :twisted:

  6. Silver Fox says:

    I’m been reading about this for a few days now and quite frankly have been unable to wrap my arms around this one. I just don’t know if this is a serious threat or a tempest in a teapot. That said I,m highly suspicious of everything Obama does. I see conspiracy at every turn with this guy. As much as I dislike like the ACLU this new executive order seems to be right up their alley. One would think they would come forward with something. But again, can I say conspiracy! Some of these things take a New York attorney to figure out, but then the answer you get also has to be translated by yet another attorney and on and on—-truth is you never really know as the grass gets deeper and deeper and the meaning becomes less clear.

    I will say this in closing, I doubt this order to be in the interest of the American people in that nothing, and I mean nothing this fool has done has been good for American. This is shit no matter how you bottle it.

  7. minuteman26 says:

    Should this come to pass, Interpol will be looked upon as varmints here in Texas. OPEN SEASON!

  8. TexasFred says:

    I’m been reading about this for a few days now and quite frankly have been unable to wrap my arms around this one.

    Exactly Silver Fox… As you say, if Obama does it, we need to keep a keen eye on it…

  9. TexasFred says:

    Interpol and the UN…

  10. Gawfer says:

    Letter just sent to Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack from yours truly:

    Dear Mary,

    First, I would like to wish you and your family a very happy New Year filled with good health and prosperity.

    Mary, I just finished reading an article in the Washington Examiner that gravely concerns me. The article was titled:
    Obama gives Interpol free hand in U.S.
    Examiner Editorial
    December 30, 2009 The link to this article if you are unaware of the issue is:
    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obama-gives-Interpol-free-hand-in-U_S_-8697583-80291137.html

    Essentially, Obama Executive Order #12425 Gives Interpol Immunity and Free Rein Inside The USA.

    What in the hell is he doing?! Is he out of his freaking mind? Please tell me there will be a public conversation and a vociferous opposition to this type of dictatorship because a lot of folks across the country are beginning to become very uncomfortable with his devil-may-care attitude.

    We are watching our Freedom and Liberty eroded at every touch of a pen, and I am not one who will quietly succumb to dependency and servant-hood to any government, nor am I one who believes there is a higher authority beyond our borders.

    Thank you for your service, and again, Happy New Year.

  11. I’ve been following this via Anthony for about a week or so. This, depending on legal interpretation, could be very dangerous. I’m writing my Senators about it, and hopefully, this isn’t what it appears to be.