The TexasFred Blog
No Holds Barred: News Opinion Commentary
This is The Header Then

How do YOU spell Loser?? Ron Paul maybe??

January 10th, 2008 . by TexasFred
I was looking up the definition of LOSER, you know, after watching the South Carolina debates and all, and I was checking my Funk and Wagnalls on line source and damn, was I ever surprised, there was NO written definition, just a picture… :?

noun – los·er /ˈluzÉ™r/ Pronunciation KeyShow Spelled Pronunciation[loo-zer] Pronunciation KeyShow IPA Pronunciation

The best observation of the night on Ron Paul and his ‘moonbattery’ has got to go to Mr. Ed Morrissey of Captain’s Quarters

Ron Paul delivered more than his share of nuttiness. The worst moment came when Brit Hume asked what the hell he was talking about, and then Hume had to repeat the question when Paul played deaf. He had just scolded everyone else on the stage for a rash reaction to the Iranian gunboat question when all of the candidates had supported the decision of the commanders not to fire, and then made it clear that he hadn’t paid attention to their answers.

Even more ludicrously, Paul suggested that Israel could have allied with moderate Arab states to eject Saddam Hussein from Kuwait in 1991 instead of having the US do it. How many of these nations will even have their representatives in the same room as an Israeli diplomat now? Ask Tzivi Lipni about that. He’s insane.

And as for the debate itself, Fox acquitted itself well for the most part, but they lose major points for not challenging Paul on the newsletters. Would they have asked George Allen about “macaca” if he had run for President? Of course they would have. So why not ask Paul about the racist, homophobic, and paranoid rants that appeared in his newsletters over a 17-year period? It’s a strange and somewhat craven action to avoid the topic.

Trackback URL:
http://texasfred.net/archives/929/trackback/

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Bookmark and Share
Return: Top of Home Page

12 Responses to “How do YOU spell Loser?? Ron Paul maybe??”

  1. comment number 1 by: Robert

    see the rest of the definition at whineylittlebastard.com (not actual link, but actual definition)

    Paul said all the right things at all the wrong times, and all the wrong things most of the time…..Very Presidential, NOT.

    Get ready for an influx of Paulians to descend upon you and cause great harm. LMAO

  2. comment number 2 by: Bloviating Zeppelin

    In Thursday’s debate, Ron Paul simply was a complete and thorough Moonbat.

    Period.

    End of statement.

    BZ

  3. comment number 3 by: da crack ho

    dat white boi done skares mah ass. him akshooly bleeves him sorry self.

  4. comment number 4 by: Kate

    Ya know, it would have been hilarious if the clown didn’t actually believe his own BS! I’m looking into the guy who has thrown his hat in to unseat that moonbat. Think his name is Chris Paden…Peden….something like that…from Friendswood. That nutjob really needs to retire!

  5. comment number 5 by: BobF

    Man, you’re in for it now from his followers. They’re probably filling up your email box right now.

  6. comment number 6 by: Debbie

    In the words of a famous political pundit, Gomer Pile, “He’s a NUT”.

    Seriously, the man is dangerous. What I can’t figure out is why he has such a huge following? Are there really that many NUTS in the US? It’s spooky

  7. comment number 7 by: TexasFred

    BobF Says:
    January 11th, 2008 at 10:09 am
    Man, you’re in for it now from his followers. They’re probably filling up your email box right now.

    Surprisingly, not that bad, not as bad as you’d expect, I had 3 RABID Paulies hit the Digg comments, because they know they can… They also know that I am NOT going to allow their moonbat screed to appear here, I made that very clear a long time back, Paul is a TARGET here and their support OF this moonbat idiot wasn’t going to be allowed…

    Yes, I DO censor some folks here, I don’t want an AMEN Blog comments section but that son of a bitch won’t get a kind word here…

  8. comment number 8 by: Carl

    I looked up the following in my Funk & Waggnalls:

    absolute loser
    nutcase
    fruitcake
    loon
    lunatic
    maxi-zoom-dweebie

    …and by golly, ALL of ‘em had Ron Paul’s picture. Coincidence? I think not.

  9. comment number 9 by: Carl

    Debbie, there are more nuts in the United States than you realize. The Constitution gives them the right to be as nutty as they want to be, just as they don’t become dangerous nuts like Charles Manson.

  10. comment number 10 by: Ranando

    Fred did pretty good, I was pleased.

    Now if he would just lose his association with George W. Bush and not become George W. Thompson, I think I might be able to get behind him.

    I just don’t want. Four More Years.

    That does concern me.

    He thinks Iraq is going just fine, I need to get pass that.

  11. comment number 11 by: Robert

    I liked what FT said about the WOT, he like several other candidates want to leave the Iraq issue up to the Gen. in charge. That IMO is the right thing now, but in the next couple of months the report needs show results.

  12. comment number 12 by: poetryman69

    I challenge anyone to google Ron + Paul + prisonplanet and google Ron + Paul + stormfront. You’ll see that Ron Paul has strong support amongst the kooks and antisemites. Before you hand your cash over to Ron Paul decide whether you are a kook, an antisemite, or both.