(CNSNews.com) – Former President George W. Bush said Tuesday that the Arab Spring is “the broadest challenge to authoritarian rule since the collapse of Soviet Communism.”

“These are extraordinary times in the history of freedom,” Bush said in a speech in Washington, D.C., sponsored by his presidential foundation, the George W. Bush Institute.

“In the Arab Spring we have seen the broadest challenge to authoritarian rule since the collapse of Soviet communism,” Bush said. “Great change has come to a region where many thought it impossible.

“The idea that Arab people are somehow content with oppression has been discredited forever,” Bush said. “Yet we’ve also seen instability, uncertainty, and the revenge of brutal rulers. The collapse of an old order can unleash resentments and power struggles that a new order is not yet prepared to handle.”

“Freedom is a powerful force,” Bush said, “but it does not advance on wheels of historical inevitability.” The event at which Bush spoke was entitled “Celebration of Human Freedom.”

Full Story Here:
Bush: ‘Arab Spring’ Is ‘Broadest Challenge to Authoritarian Rule Since Collapse of Soviet Communism’

It’s been a while since I made this statement on the blog; George W. Bush is a MORON. 

It’s as true now as it was 4 years ago, to the day, a day when George W. Bush convinced even his most ardent supporters that he truly IS a dim bulb when it comes to having an understanding of the FACT that there will NEVER be peace among Arabs and Muslims.

The above story is from May 15, 2012, the story below is from May 15, 2008, the original story and my commentary. Coincidence perhaps? Or repetitive mind lapses?

Bush envisions a democratic Middle East free of oppression

JERUSALEM (AP) – President Bush feted Israel on Thursday in honor of the 60th anniversary of its founding and predicted that its 120th birthday would find it alongside a Palestinian state and in an all-democratic neighborhood free of today’s oppression, restrictions on freedom and extremist Muslim movements.

Delivering this rosy forecast for the Middle East in 2068 during a speech to the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, Bush limited his mention of Palestinians to just one sentence. “The Palestinian people will have the homeland they have long dreamed of and deserved, a democratic state that is governed by law, and respects human rights, and rejects terror,” he said.

This scant talk of the other side of one of the world’s longest-running disputes contrasted jarringly with the more expansive treatment of the subject by Bush’s Israeli hosts.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told the lawmakers that he is working hard for an accord and believes “when the day comes for a historic peace agreement” that both the Knesset and the Israeli public will support it “by a large majority.” The chamber reacted with silence and nervous laughter, which Bush briefly joined. Two hardline lawmakers walked out of the chamber in protest during Olmert’s address.

Full Story Here:
Bush envisions a democratic Middle East free of oppression

Can the POTUS be forced to take a drug or alcohol test?? I don’t know who Bush thinks he stroking here but if he believes that BS he’s either drunk or stoned.

There will never be peace in the Mid-East, not as long as there is one Islamic radical left alive, if there is so much as one of the followers of Mohammad left breathing he will be doing everything in his power to destroy Israel, the Jews or any Christian he can find.

I guess Bush and Company have never studied history, recent or far past, if they had then they would know that what we’re seeing in the world now is a modern day version of The Crusades, and the outcome will not be any different now, or 60 years from now, than it was throughout the rest of history, The Crusades.

Islam will never peacefully coexist with Jews or Christians, it can’t happen, Islam is NOT a democratic religion or peaceful religion, it is a religion of dominance and violence against any who don’t submit to it’s teachings, the very thought of democracy or freedom is foreign to a Muslim, and why in the world George Bush thinks 60 year will change that, when hundreds of years hasn’t, well, it is beyond me.

There is only one way for democracy to reign in the Mid-East, and that will be for ALL Muslims to renounce their teachings and accept ALL Christians and Jews, male and female, as equals, once that happens there may be a slight chance of freedom spreading throughout that region of the world as oppression becomes a distant memory.

“From Cairo and Riyadh to Baghdad and Beirut, people will live in free and independent societies, where a desire for peace is reinforced by ties of diplomacy, tourism and trade,” he said. “Iran and Syria will be peaceful nations, where today’s oppression is a distant memory and people are free to speak their minds and develop their talents. And al-Qaida, Hezbollah and Hamas will be defeated, as Muslims across the region recognize the emptiness of the terrorists’ vision and the injustice of their cause.”

As Golda Meir said “Peace will come only when Palestinians love their children more than they hate Jews.”, and she was entirely correct, Mr. Bush seems to think he is talking about a sane people when he espouses his vision of peace, Mr. Bush, you may not want to accept it but al-Qaida, Hezbollah and Hamas are fairly good representations OF the true desires of Islam, it’s all about dominance and submission, and until that changes, nothing else will either.

Bush envisions a democratic Middle East free of oppression

Ladies and Gentlemen, it appears to me that George W. Bush hasn’t gotten ANY smarter regarding Islam, Arabs, freedom and democracy for Muslims and Arabs than he was 4 years ago.

A super PAC supporting Senate front-runner David Dewhurst has made a $1 million media buy, according to the Federal Election Commission. In ads that Texas Conservatives Fund chief Rob Johnson said began to air Tuesday, the group trashes Dewhurst’s GOP rival, Ted Cruz. We’ll do more about this ad later because it twists almost beyond recognition the facts of Texas’ 2005-2006 school finance debate, much as Cruz has done in accusing Dewhurst of promoting a state corporate income tax.

All you need to know is that Cruz grew up in Houston, as a boy veritably drinking from that city’s open fire hydrant of libertarian-leaning conservativism — some of it, a tad on the whacky side. I reported on that in depth in this profile of Cruz last month.

Now, though, voters unfamiliar with Cruz will be given a narrative that he is a phony conservative in ads by Johnson’s group, which is the Austin-based, pro-Dewhurst super PAC — there are two, you know. That would be a very hard sell with anyone well-informed about Cruz. But of course, that’s the point of political advertising, isn’t it?

The ad’s punch line:

“Ted Cruz a conservative? You gotta be kidding … No way!”

Full Story Here:
Pro-Dewhurst super PAC unloads $1M on ads in attempt to bury Cruz

Somehow, I don’t think the writer for the Dallas Morning News meant for his post to be a SUPPORT DEWHURST post, but in MY opinion, it just became one!

Ted Cruz: China’s legal mercenary

Trial lawyer Ted Cruz represents thieves from a Chinese conglomerate in its attempts to deny justice to an American entrepreneur. Ted Cruz’s profiteering has aided, and continues to aid, a Chinese billion-dollar conglomerate, Shandong Linglong, in killing American jobs.

Ted Cruz decided to completely betray America in the ongoing struggle to combat intellectual property theft by Chinese companies. Even more shocking is the fact that Ted Cruz consciously decided to help decimate an American business and cripple American inventor and entrepreneur Jordan Fishman by further delaying justice. SOURCE

Trial lawyer Ted Cruz: Defending Chinese intellectual property thieves in the courtroom

Chinese intellectual property thieves stole 74-year-old Jordan Fishman’s life’s work. The thieves were found liable on every claim at trial in federal court (Jury Verdict, 7/15/10). They were instructed to pay American inventor and entrepreneur Jordan Fishman $26 million (Court Order, 7/19/10).

Unwilling to pay for their wrongdoing, the thieving Chinese company hired the one man they knew who would accept the bounty against an American businessman: shameless legal mercenary Ted Cruz (Appearance of Counsel, 11/18/10).

Trial lawyer Ted Cruz knew in advance he was representing a Chinese company that a U.S. jury found had stolen Fishman’s life work. But the dollar signs in Ted Cruz’s eyes helped him make the wrong decision.

Ted Cruz took up the pirate banners as lead counsel for Chinese conglomerate Shandong Linglong and is trying to help destroy intellectual property theft victim Jordan Fishman (Texas Monthly, 10/3/11).

As a trial lawyer, “Ted Cruz will put profit over America.” SOURCE

Is a Pro-Chinese trial lawyer what Texas needs as a U.S. Senator? I think not…

SUPPORT DAVID DEWHURST for U.S. Senator from Texas! The TexasFred Blog does!

NEW YORK (AP) – President Barack Obama on Monday defended his view that gay couples should have the right to marry, saying that the country has never gone wrong when it “expanded rights and responsibilities to everybody.”

“That doesn’t weaken families. That strengthens families,” he told gay and lesbian supporters and others at a fundraiser hosted by singer Ricky Martin and the LGBT Leadership Council. “It’s the right thing to do.”

The remarks were his first to such an audience since he announced his personal support for same-sex marriage last week. They came on a day that Obama was making a targeted appeal to three core voting blocs – women, young people, and gays and lesbians. He gave a commencement address to Barnard College, a women’s college, and taped an interview on “The View,” a popular day-time talk show aimed at women.

Democrats hope Obama’s politically risky embrace of gay marriage will re-energize supporters who had been frustrated by his previous assertions that his views on the hot-button social issue were “evolving.”

Full Story Here:
Obama on gay marriage: ‘Right thing to do’

That small picture of Obama at the top of this post with his *grimace*, that is the image I have in my head of what he looks like every time a Conservative blogger or writer makes a post blasting him!

Anyway … “It’s the right thing to do.”? The RIGHT thing to do?

No Chicago Jesus, it’s NOT the RIGHT thing to do, it’s the LEFT thing to do and you are using this issue to deflect interest away from other topics that ALSO matter greatly to Conservatives, matters like;

1. The economy.
2. Jobs.
3. National security.
4. LEGAL Immigration.
5. Vacations and constant campaigning, by you and yours, on OUR dime.
6. The Socialization of America.
7. Your attempts to control every aspect of American life.
8. Oh, and then there’s that little issue of GUN RUNNING, Fast and Furious?

Women, young people and gay voters all made up crucial voting blocs for Obama in the 2008 election. With the president locked in a close race with Republican rival Mitt Romney, his campaign is focused on rallying support among those groups once again.

“At root, so much of this has to do with a belief that not only are we all in this together but all of us are equal in terms of dignity and in terms of respect, and everybody deserves a shot,” he told about 200 supporters at the fundraising event.

You managed to get about 200 homosexual supporters to show up at an event hosted by homosexual singer Ricky Martin and the LGBT Leadership Council? 200 supporters? That’s it?

Let me make this as plain and easily understood as I possibly can; I don’t care what YOU do in YOUR bedroom, in the privacy of your home, in a motel, in someone else’s home, whatever, as long as it is done in PRIVATE, and done between consenting adults, have at it, whatever trips your trigger. I’m not the one that has to answer for YOUR actions.

But please, don’t tell me that being a homosexual is the natural order of things, you are only perpetuating a LIE, one that goes against the laws of God and against the laws of nature.

“Oh but Fred, you neanderthal knuckle dragger, homosexuals and lesbians have the same paternal and maternal instincts as do you *breeders*, but we adopt!”

Yeah, you do, and you end up with a kid that’s as screwed up as YOU are.

A kid that’s raised in a *I have TWO Mommies or Daddies* environment is only going to continue the cycle. There’s a lot of screwed up people out there right now because of the *Hippie* movement and the loose morals it instilled in so many young people. This homosexual marriage thing is just one more sign that the morals of America are in the tank, and when the President of the United States comes OUT and embraces that homosexual marriage belief, that is indicative of the fact that America MUST return to being a Conservative and moral nation.

A Conservative and moral nation; something that will NEVER happen under an abortion supporting, LGBT loving socialist scumbag like Barack Hussein Obama.

Don’t take your eyes off of the REAL issues America, this homosexual marriage brouhaha is nothing more than a weak effort to distract American Patriots from more important issues.

Yes, this IS an important issue, but it’s only one in a long list of MANY issues that we face in this nation under the REGIME of one Barack Hussein Obama.

]]>

There are African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Asian-Americans, Arab-Americans, Native-Americans, etc.
And then there are just – Americans.

Some of you pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.

You call me ‘White boy’, ‘Cracker’, ‘Honky’, ‘Whitey’, ‘Gringo’ or ‘Caveman’, and as far as you are concerned, that’s OK, but if I say so much as one word that you consider to be out of line, I am branded as a vile racist.

You say that whites commit acts of violence against you … so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?

You have the United Negro College Fund, Hispanic History Month, Martin Luther King Day, Asian History Month, Black Entertainment Television, Black History Month, Cesar Chavez Day, Kwanzaa and the NAACP.

If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we’d be called racists.

If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.

If we had a White History Month, we’d be called racist for that.

If we had any organization for Whites Only to ‘advance’ OUR lives, we’d certainly be branded as racists.

There’s a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and a Black Chamber of Commerce.

Then we have the Chamber of Commerce, not a White Chamber of Commerce, just The Chamber of Commerce.

If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships, you know we’d be called evil racists.

There are openly-proclaimed Black-Only Colleges in the US, yet if there were ‘White-Only Colleges’, why THAT would be a racist college, and probably illegal.

In the Million-Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights.

If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us bog dwelling, redneck racists.

You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and red, and you’re not afraid to announce it.

But when we announce our White Pride, yeah, you got it, we get called racists, NAZIs and a lot worse.

You can rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us, and we’re supposed to sit back and take it? Nope, not gonna happen!

So why is it that when a white police officer shoots a black gang member, or beats up a black drug-dealer that’s running from the LAW, and posing a threat to ALL of society, why do you call that police officer a racist for simply doing his job?

I am White and I am proud, but, you call me a racist.

Why is it that only whites can be racists?

If this post angers you, take a good long look in the mirror and ask yourself, WHY does it make me angry?

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all. ~Theodore Roosevelt~

WASHINGTON (AP) — Ron Paul, the congressman from Texas and a favorite of tea partyers, effectively ended his presidential campaign Monday but urged his fervent supporters to continue working at the state party level to cause havoc for presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney.

In an email to supporters, Paul urged his libertarian-leaning backers to remain involved in politics and champion his causes despite the apparent end of his presidential aspirations. Paul has found success in wrecking the selection process for delegates to the party’s late-summer nominating convention in Tampa, Fla., and trumpeted that he has delayed Romney’s expected nomination.

“Moving forward, however, we will no longer spend resources campaigning in primaries in states that have not yet voted,” Paul said in his statement. “Doing so with any hope of success would take many tens of millions of dollars we simply do not have. I encourage all supporters of liberty to make sure you get to the polls and make your voices heard, particularly in the local, state and congressional elections, where so many defenders of freedom are fighting and need your support.”

Paul’s supporters have proved successful in winning state GOP conventions in places such as Maine and Nevada. His supporters in Iowa and Nevada were chosen to lead the state central parties.

Full Story Here:
Paul: ‘We will no longer spend resources’

Don’t go away MAD you old MOONBAT, just go away!

And do us ALL a favor? Take Jerry, Babs and all the rest of your disgusting Paultards with you on your way back to *The Mother Ship*…

Now we can ALL concentrate on not voting for Mitt Romney, but voting against Barack Hussein Obama. And THAT is exactly what I will tell myself I am doing!

The biggest farce that ever infested American politics.

Newsweek magazine’s latest cover proclaims Barack Obama the ‘first gay president’. He’d rather focus on the economy than his controversial new support for same-sex marriage. But that’s a tough issue for him, as recent polls show.

Like Mitt Romney, President Obama no doubt wishes the same-sex marriage question would fade into the background so that issues more important to most Americans – say, the economy – could become the focus of campaign 2012.

That’s unlikely to happen this coming week.

The cover of Newsweek magazine portrays Obama with a rainbow halo and proclaims that he’s the “first gay president.” The New Yorker cover picks up on the rainbow theme – shown as multi-hued White House columns – in what it’s calling its “Spectrum of Light” cover. Both magazines hit newsstands Monday.

It may be true, as Rep. Barney Frank (D) of Massachusetts – the first openly-gay member of Congress – says, that Obama’s coming out on behalf of same-sex marriage this past week won’t make much difference in November’s election.

Full Story Here:
Is Obama the ‘first gay president’ as Newsweek proclaims?

There is a very important piece of information that CSM doesn’t say anything about; Andrew Sullivan is the person that wrote the cover story for Newsweek, and Andrew Sullivan is as QUEER as a $3 bill, so, if anyone would know whether Barack Hussein Obama is a QUEER or not, I would have to assume that Andrew Sullivan would know.

Sullivan was born in South Godstone, Surrey, England, to a Roman Catholic family of Irish descent, and was brought up in the nearby town of East Grinstead, West Sussex. He was educated at Reigate Grammar School, and studied at Magdalen College, Oxford, where he was awarded a first-class degree Bachelor of Arts in modern history and modern languages. In his second year, he was elected president of the Oxford Union, holding the office in Trinity term 1983, although criticized for his tactics in founding a university society as a vehicle for his electoral ambitions by Boris Johnson.

Sullivan earned a Master in Public Administration from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, followed by a PhD on government from Harvard, his dissertation being on the conservative British philosopher Michael Oakeshott.

Sullivan, in 2003, wrote a Salon article identifying himself as a member of the gay “bear community”. On 27 August 2007, Sullivan married his husband Aaron Tone in Provincetown, Massachusetts.

Sullivan had a long-expressed desire to become a U.S. citizen, but was barred for many years from applying for citizenship because of his HIV-positive status. SOURCE

There have been rumors about Obama being a homosexual, or possibly a bi-sexual, and those rumors were not started by anyone on the RIGHT.

Sleaze charge: ‘I took drugs, had homo sex with Obama’

WASHINGTON – The electrifying presidential campaign of Barack Obama faces a new challenge – a Minnesota man who claims he took cocaine in 1999 with the then–Illinois legislator and participated in homosexual acts with him.

When his story was ignored by the news media, Larry Sinclair made his case last month in a YouTube video, which has now been viewed more than a quarter-million times. And when it was still ignored by the media, Sinclair filed a suit in Minnesota District Court, alleging threats and intimidation by Obama’s staff.

Sinclair, who says he is willing to submit to a polygraph test to validate his claims, will now get his chance – thanks to a website offering $10,000 for the right to record it and $100,000 to Sinclair if he passes. SOURCE

Is ANY of this true? I don’t know, I wasn’t there, but the accusations are out there, and now Andrew Sullivan fires a shot calling Barack Hussein Obama the ‘first gay president’?

It’s all pretty suspicious in my opinion; North Carolina votes an amendment into their state Constitution and all of a sudden Barack Hussein Obama magically *comes out* in favor of homosexual marriage. Suspicious to me, especially when you consider this;

Obama Says He Is Against Same-Sex Marriage

ABC News’ Teddy Davis, Sunlen Miller, Tahman Bradley, and Rigel Anderson report: Barack Obama’s nuanced position on same-sex marriage is on full display in an MTV interview which is set to air on Monday.

Obama told MTV he believes marriage is “between a man and a woman” and that he is “not in favor of gay marriage.”

Full Story Here:
Obama Says He Is Against Same-Sex Marriage

If this were done by a GOP candidate, it would be called a *flip-flop*, but since it’s Obama, he’s described as having an *evolving opinion*.

The duplicity of the Democrats and Libbers is beyond belief.

And to make this crystal clear to any and ALL reading here, I don’t call it GAY, I refuse to bastardize the word GAY. It’s homosexual, call it what it is.

Pay attention America; WE HAVE BEEN SCREWED, and I can’t think of any nicer way to say it. We’ve been screwed by Liberal politicians, tree huggers, Greenies, anti-oil people and by those that control drilling and exploration. I have long advocated; the USA is NOT out of oil, we never have been, and quite likely, never will be.

(CNSNews.com) – The Green River Formation, a largely vacant area of mostly federal land that covers the territory where Colorado, Utah and Wyoming come together, contains about as much recoverable oil as all the rest the world’s proven reserves combined, an auditor from the Government Accountability Office told Congress on Thursday.

The GAO testimony stressed that the federal government was in “a unique position to influence the development of oil shale” because the Green River deposits were mostly beneath federal land.

It also noted that developing the oil would pose “socioeconomic challenges,” which included bringing “a sizable influx of workers who along with their families put additional stress on local infrastructure” and “making planning for growth difficult for local governments.”

“The Green River Formation–an assemblage of over 1,000 feet of sedimentary rocks that lie beneath parts of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming–contains the world’s largest deposits of oil shale,”Anu K. Mittal, the GAO’s director of natural resources and environment said in written testimony submitted to the House Science Subcommittee on Energy and Environment.

“USGS estimates that the Green River Formation contains about 3 trillion barrels of oil, and about half of this may be recoverable, depending on available technology and economic conditions,” Mittal testified.

Full Story Here:
GAO: Recoverable Oil in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming ‘About Equal to Entire World’s Proven Oil Reserves’

I have been posting those figures in blog stories for several years now, several links are listed at the end of this post, and I have to say, one of the few things Sarah Palin said that I totally agreed with was *drill baby drill*.

Once you figure in the Canadian oil sands, well, it’s unbelievable how much oil North America has. I believe that .50 a gallon would be about right too, on the price at the pump, that would surely piss off the *little sheet heads* at OPEC that Obama is so fond of.

But you know, it’s not just the Obama regime either, this has been going on for far too long, from MANY Presidents. Our nation could be totally energy independent in a very short time, and as I said, figure in Canadian oil sands, and then figure in ANWR, and the Gulf of Mexico, the oil off of the California coast and the east coast of the USA. Do you see it too?

We don’t NEED the world, we have ALL we need and then some, but the eco-nuts have the government by the throat, a sad statement of affairs. And the American taxpayer takes a screwing for it, WE get blamed for the GloBULL warming that is rapidly being proven as false.

And the hits just keep on coming! Here are a few more links that attest to the FACT that the USA is oil INDEPENDENT.

Ever heard of the Bakken Oil Formation?
New report says U.S. has largest fossil fuel reserves in world
Obama to call for cut of oil imports by a third
OPEC leaves output on hold, causing oil price jump
Russian oil teams up with Exxon Mobil
Obama rejects new oil pipeline, blames Congress
U.S. oil gusher blows out projections
TransCanada Renewing Request to Build Keystone Pipeline

New York Post – Bill Clinton thought so little of President Obama — mocking him as an “amateur” — that he pressed his wife last summer to quit her job as secretary of state and challenge him in the primaries, a new book claims,

“The country needs you!” the former president told Hillary Clinton, urging her to run this year, according to accounts of the conversation included in Edward Klein’s new biography of Obama.

The title of Klein’s explosive, unauthorized bio of Obama, “The Amateur” (Regnery Publishing), was taken directly from Bill Clinton’s bombshell criticism of the president, the author said.

“Barack Obama,” Bill Clinton said, according to book excerpts, “is an amateur.”

Full Story Here:
Bill blockbuster: O’s an ‘amateur’

Does anyone know what *The Peter Principle* is?

The Peter Principle is a belief that in an organization where promotion is based on achievement, success, and merit, that organization’s members will eventually be promoted beyond their level of ability. The principle is commonly phrased, “employees tend to rise to their level of incompetence.”

Barack Hussein Obama was *Peter Principled* long before he reached the Oval Office!

The withering criticism is incredible, given the fact that Bill Clinton is actively campaigning for Obama’s re-election.

But according to the book, Bill Clinton unloaded on Obama and pressed Hillary to run against her boss during a gathering in the ex-president’s home office in Chappaqua last August that included longtime friends, Klein said.

“The economy’s a mess, it’s dead flat. America has lost its Triple-A rating . . . You know better than Obama does,” Bill said.

Bill Clinton insisted he had “no relationship” with Obama and had been consulted more frequently by his presidential successor, George W. Bush.

Obama, Bill Clinton said, “doesn’t know how to be president” and is “incompetent.”

I don’t usually share *HATE MAIL*, most times it’s unintelligible and nasty, I just don’t put that kind of crap on the blog, but this one kinda/sorta piqued my interest since this post points out an instance of Bill Clinton blasting off on Barack Hussein Obama.

From: John Steves [mailto:johnsteves162@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 1:05 PM
To: fredwitzell@verizon.net
Subject: Racist Scum

I just want to let you know that you are the type of racist and prejudice scum that is still infecting our wonderful county. I cannot believe that you can honestly look yourself in the mirror and be happy with what you see. You are putting poison in people’s heads and need to realize that you aren’t living in the 50′s anymore. Wake up to the times and learn how to be open to others beliefs!

Sincerely,
The Proud American Youth

John, how can I respond to your accusations of me being *racist and prejudice scum* when I am not exactly sure of what it is you are talking about? I have no idea regarding what you are proud of, I can guess, but that’s all it is, a guess.

I have to ask you John, your accusation saying *you are the type of racist and prejudice scum*, wouldn’t it be more grammatically correct to say *you are the type of racist and prejudiced scum*?  Obviously composition was NOT your strong suit John.

You want ME to “Wake up to the times and learn how to be open to others beliefs!”?

Even if I am convinced that those beliefs are wrong and to embrace those beliefs would make me a hypocrite?

I don’t tell you to subscribe to MY beliefs, YOU are free to do and believe as you please, even if I feel that YOUR beliefs wrong. Am I not also entitled to MY beliefs?

I may criticize you and your beliefs, on MY blog, but as an American, a blogger and a supporter of the U.S. Constitution, I am entitled to express those opinions on MY blog.

Are you attempting to suppress MY right to FREE SPEECH on MY blog site John? Are you attempting to suppress my FREE SPEECH through acts of intimidation?

Or is this just more of the duplicitous bullshit that IS liberalism? Free speech for thee, but not for me? Typical libber suppression tactics John, and seriously, you’re not very good at it.

I was a small child in the 1950′s and you know, I remember it as a HAPPY time for most Americans. That may be because I was, as I said, a child, and didn’t see *THE BIG PICTURE*, but as I grew into the 1960′s I saw things through different eyes, and I was all for freedom of speech, still am, and for racial equality, still am, but now, just as then, I detest TRASH, and what I see in the White House now is pure BLACK TRASH, but by the same token, I had NO USE for WHITE TRASH being in the White House and I won’t accept that either.

I have to assume that you are referring to my immense hatred of Barack Hussein Obama and all things connected to him and his evil regime, and seriously, with your childish, non-specific screed I can only guess. So, here’s the deal, I do hate Obama, and I hate all things connected to him, but I hate his WHITE HALF just as much as I do his BLACK HALF.

I’m an equal opportunity racist, or, if you prefer, bigot.

If that is what you are basing your accusations on, just like most libber asses that throw the race card, Jack$on and $harpton and the like, you are WRONG! But thank you for allowing me the opportunity to address your childish email in an adult format.

So, let me ask you this John, if I am correct that it’s my intense hatred of Obama that you are using to call me *racist and prejudice scum*, is Bill Clinton *racist and prejudice scum* as well? It appears that he’s not too fond of Obama either.

OR … is the duplicity that is all things Libber going to allow you, and people like you, to give Clinton a free pass and just see him him as a free thinker, exercising his FREE SPEECH?

John, if you wish to expound on your opinions and accusations, I suggest that you register and engage me HERE on the blog, your personal emails to my account have been blocked.

OK, back to the post at hand; I personally would love to see Hillary Clinton run against Barack Hussein Obama, and take that Muslim loving, American hating piece of trash DOWN.

Meanwhile, today’s daily presidential Rasmussen Poll shows Mitt Romney ahead of the president with 50 percent to Obama’s 43 percent. It is the highest level of support the presumptive Republican nominee has received in his matchup with Obama as well as his largest lead.

I am actually starting to believe that Mitt Romney can beat Obama come November. I’m not at all convinced that Romney will make a good President, but the truth of the matter is; he has got to be better than the stumbling, stuttering Kenyan poser ever dreamed of being!

What I don’t know is this; if Hillary Clinton had taken Obama on, and won, could Romney have beaten HER?

I think not.

PHOENIX (AP) – Federal authorities have said they plan to sue Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio and his office over allegations of civil rights violations, including the racial profiling of Latinos.

The U.S. Justice Department has been seeking an agreement requiring Arpaio’s office to train officers in how to make constitutional traffic stops, collect data on people arrested in traffic stops and reach out to Latinos to assure them that the department is there to also protect them.

Arpaio has denied the racial profiling allegations and has claimed that allowing a court monitor would mean that every policy decision would have to be cleared through an observer and would nullify his authority.

The self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America has been a national political fixture who has built his reputation on jailing inmates in tents and dressing them in pink underwear, selling himself to voters as unceasingly tough on crime and pushing the bounds of how far local police can go to confront illegal immigration.

Full Story Here:
Justice Dept. plans to sue Arizona sheriff Arpaio

The hardest working Sheriff in America is once again under attack from the most dangerously inept Department of Justice in American history.

The Department of Justice (DoJ) is NOT doing its own job. Our border aren’t safe, our nation is not sovereign and secure.

The DoJ, under the administration of one Eric Holder, is a farce, and is quite likely guilty of crimes far worse that some supposed civil rights violation … well, unless you could consider it a violation of their personal civil rights when agents Jaimie Zapata and Brian Terry were MURDERED with weapons that were provided BY the Obama administration, through the offices of Attorney General Eric Holder and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) and deliberately allowed to fall into the hands of Mexican drug cartels via Operation Fast and Furious.

Somehow, Obama, Holder, Napolitano et al don’t seem to see any evidence of wrong-doing in that effort, at least not on their part.

But amazingly, Obama, Holder, Napolitano et al can find justification in suing Sheriff Joe Arpaio for doing HIS job and allowing HIS Deputies to do the job that Barack Hussein Obama and his band of ne’er do wells won’t do.

DOJ officials told a lawyer for Arpaio on April 3 that the lawman’s refusal of a court-appointed monitor was a deal-breaker that would end settlement negotiations and result in a federal lawsuit.

Do these assclowns at DoJ not see their threats against Arpaio as sheer harassment? Do they not see and recognize that Arizona is a SOVEREIGN state? One that the DoJ can’t just go poking around in and meddling in their STATE and COUNTY affairs?

According to THIS, 29.6% of the people in Arizona are Hispanic.

DoJ is worried about *profiling*, and that being the reason for traffic stops being initiated that are against a large number of Hispanics? And DoJ wonders WHY so many of those stops lead to arrests on charges *OTHER* that traffic violations?

Apparently DoJ has never done ANY work in *real world* law enforcement.

A large percentage of Arizona residents are *reported* to be Hispanic, I’m going to venture a guess that there are at least as many Hispanics in Arizona that are NOT reported as there are those reported, somewhere close to that number anyway.

Now I am going to present a bit of opinion that ANYONE that has ever lived ON or NEAR the border will readily tell you; Mexicans come to this nation and the cars they drive are, mostly, pieces of crap, uninsured, and the Mexicans driving them are some of the most incredibly BAD drivers you have ever seen.

THAT is what triggers most of the traffic stops that does indeed lead to *other* violations being found. Good police work leading to the finding of *other* matters that are indeed a safety issue for those of us that ARE legal and trying to do OUR business correctly.

I seriously don’t know what this nation is coming to. Yesterday the big news was Obama voices his support for gay marriage and this one that slipped through the cracks, House Democrats: NYPD should purge ‘spy’ files. Barack Hussein Obama (Flaming Libber) is the first President in U.S. history to come out and say he supports the homosexual agenda and homosexual marriage, and he is backed by a bunch of Democratic Congress Critters that are more concerned with how to avoid angering radical Islam and the terrorists OF Islam that threaten the American people than they are in protecting Americans and supporting hard working Lawmen like Joe Arpaio!

Joe Arpaio is doing everything within his power to protect his part of Arizona and to keep things like this from happening in the USA! Police find 18 bodies near Mexican tourist lake.

Janet Napolitano *claims* that the borders are safer now than ever before, but she is wrong. Our border are still dangerous, VERY dangerous, and the only thing standing between us and Mexico is a few hard working men like Arpaio, other Sheriffs and State Police like him and the efforts of the U.S. Border Patrol.

America is in trouble my friends. New York Court Says Viewing Child Porn Online is A-OK.

When ANY court in this land can issue a decision like that, it is time for ALL bleeding heart, abortion loving child porn supporting Democratic LIBERALS to be totally and permanently removed from office.

We either take this nation back, remove it from the hands of people like Barack Hussein Obama and his band of Marxist DEVILS, or America is surely doomed.

May God have mercy on us all.

WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama declared unequivocal support for gay marriage on Wednesday, becoming the first president to endorse the politically explosive idea and injecting a polarizing issue into the 2012 race for the White House.

Obama’s announcement, after refusing to take a clear stand for months, cheered gay rights groups who have long urged him to support gay marriage. It also opened up a distinct area of disagreement with Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who opposes gay marriage.

Polling suggests the nation is evenly divided on the issue

“I have hesitated on gay marriage in part because I thought that civil unions would be sufficient,” Obama said in an interview with ABC at the White House. He added that, “I was sensitive to the fact that for a lot of people the word ‘marriage’ was something that invokes very powerful traditions, religious beliefs and so forth.”

Full Story Here:
Obama voices his support for gay marriage

So, Barack Hussein Obama and John Kerry actually DO have some commonality. It seems they both like *flip-flops*. ”I was for it/against it before I was against it/for it”, something like that. Obama may have just cost himself an election!

I have to thank my good friend Rob at American and Proud for this graphic! Unicorn farts and rainbows. Barack the Rainbow Warrior! The only thing lacking is Fairy Dust. Uh, wait…

I wonder what was on his mind when this was the story about 4 years ago?

Obama Says He Is Against Same-Sex Marriage

ABC News’ Teddy Davis, Sunlen Miller, Tahman Bradley, and Rigel Anderson report: Barack Obama’s nuanced position on same-sex marriage is on full display in an MTV interview which is set to air on Monday.

Obama told MTV he believes marriage is “between a man and a woman” and that he is “not in favor of gay marriage.”

Full Story Here:
Obama Says He Is Against Same-Sex Marriage

Well, now we get to see if Black Evangelical voters are going to vote for what’s RIGHT or are they going to vote for what’s Black.

This is a TEST for the religious Black community, and it has always been my observation that MANY Black folks are VERY religious, so, will they follow The Messiah or will they make hypocrites of themselves and follow the Obamessiah?