Archive for the 'News and Opinion' Category

Minorities fare worse in traffic stops

Sunday, April 29th, 2007

Black, Latino drivers fare worse in traffic stops

Study: Minorities searched, jailed more often than whites when pulled over

WASHINGTON - Black, Hispanic and white drivers are equally likely to be pulled over by police, but blacks and Hispanics are much more likely to be searched and arrested, a federal study found.

Police were much more likely to threaten or use force against blacks and Hispanics than against whites in any encounter, whether at a traffic stop or elsewhere, according to the Justice Department.

The study, released Sunday by the department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics, covered police contacts with the public during 2005 and was based on interviews by the Census Bureau with nearly 64,000 people age 16 or over.

“The numbers are very consistent” with those found in a similar study of police-public contacts in 2002, bureau statistician Matthew R. Durose, the report’s co-author, said in an interview. “There’s some stability in the findings over these three years.”

Full Story Here:
Minorities fare worse in traffic stops

Having witnessed, or been involved in a few traffic stops conducted over the years, and having known very well or been related to some of those making the stops, I can tell you this from 1st hand experience and observation, the minorities that DID catch the really nasty end of the stick we’re the ones that brought it upon themselves…

They exited their vehicles in a rapid and threatening manner, they were loud, abusive and profane, with those actions being directed towards the officer making the stop, regardless of the officers demeanor, and there always seemed to be a CHIP on the shoulder of the minority that had the worst attitude, the professional victim syndrome so to speak…

It’s something you sort of expect when you stop a ‘63 Chevy low-rider or a Caddy pimp-mobile with the fuzzy dice and hip-hop rocking windows 3 blocks away, but I have seen supposedly professional Blacks and Hispanics go absolutely ballistic because of a routine traffic stop…

It’s pretty likely I will again be called a racist for this type of post but I don’t care, if people don’t want to be subjected to profiled traffic stops, don’t engage in profiled activities, if you want to be treated in a professional manner, act as if you ARE a professional, and that applies to the Officer as well, if you want to be talked to in a respectful manner, address the officer in a moderate and pleasant tone of voice, if you use that as YOUR standard and the officer doesn’t, you win, hands down, no pun intended…

You get out of the car and the 1st words out of your mouth are “What the f**k are you stoppin’ me for you white-assed honky pig??” and you can pretty well rest assured it’s going to go down hill from there, really fast…

Rice: Bush Would Oppose Iraq Benchmarks

Sunday, April 29th, 2007

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush will not support a war spending bill that punishes the Iraqi government for failing to meet benchmarks for progress, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Sunday.

Rice’s comments cast fresh doubt on a potential compromise between the Democratic-led Congress and the White House in getting money to U.S. troops.

Didn’t Mr. Bush and the Sec/Def both tell us, as well as Iraq and the entire world, that the U.S. commitment to Iraq is NOT open ended?? I seem to distinctly remember him saying that the Iraqis must show progress of their own if they want us to stay… Yes, they did, I had to refresh my memory as to when and where but it was fairly recent as indicated Here , Here and Here

He said disagreeing with him over the war — as many in the room do — does not mean “you don’t share the same sense of patriotism I do.”

“You can get that thought out of your mind, if that’s what some believe,” the president said. “These are tough times, but there’s no doubt in my mind that you want to secure this homeland as much as I do.”

Uh, Mr. President, I, as well as most Conservative already know that, but could you do us a favor?? Pass that on to a certain group that we refer to as ‘Bush Bots’?? Especially one Army wife in particular?? She really believes that anyone that disagrees with you is the Devil incarnate, she told me my Teddy Roosevelt quote at the top of my blog was an effort to twist things to MY way, I mean, you know better, and so do most people, but could ya drop her and her 3 or 4 buddies a note and tell em it’s OK and they don’t have to use covert means to try and destroy someones blog?? Please?? Just askin’…

“I listened to many members here, I listened to members of my own party, I listened to the military and came up with a plan that I genuinely believe has the best of succeeding,” the president said.

‘And after listening to all those people I decided to do it MY way, since I’m the decider and all, and since there’s not a damn thing any of y’all can do, I’m a ‘lame duck’, what are you gonna do, not re-elect me?’ would likely be a lot closer to what the real thought process was…

What this all boils down to is partisan politics, and it’s being used to play with the lives of American troops, and that’s not right, no matter who is doing it…

Full Story Here:
Rice: Bush Would Oppose Iraq Benchmarks

Iraq Leader Warns Iran on Attacks Abroad

Sunday, April 29th, 2007

BAGHDAD (AP) - Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki told an Iranian envoy Sunday that the persistent attacks in Iraq are also a threat abroad, a pointed warning amid U.S. accusations that the government in Tehran is stoking the violence by supporting Shiite militias.

That may be construed as a pointed warning in some circles but seriously, what is al-Maliki going to do other than talk and beg?? Without the USA backing him, al-Maliki is a toothless tiger and Iran is fully aware of that fact…

Al-Maliki met with top Iranian envoy Ali Larijani in Baghdad as Iran agreed to attend a major U.S.-backed regional conference on Iraq set for this week in Egypt, raising hopes that bringing Iraq’s neighbors together will help stabilize the country.

U.S. backed talks may be the way to settle this but I’m not so sure, history points out, quite clearly, the Arabs and Persians and most other people of that region of the world have been killing each other for centuries, over the most minor insult, and full blown tribal and sectarian wars are fought over a difference of opinion in religious interpretation, what makes us so confident that we can change centuries of tribal aggression with some talks?? Until there is a change in attitude by the Muslims, nothing else will change…

“Terrorist operations targeting Iraq will affect all countries in the world that are supposed to be supporting the Iraqi government in its war against terrorism,” al-Maliki said in a statement issued by his office, adding that the prime minister also thanked Iran for agreeing to participate in this week’s conference in Sharm el-Sheik.

al-Maliki is shooting in the dark, he’s hoping his brethren will rally to his side if he makes an impassioned plea for unity and support, we ALL know where the terrorists and insurgents come from and we ALL know why they have descended upon Iraq, no one in the Islamic world wants to see a viable, working democracy in play in Iraq, that is a sign of defeat as far as the Muslims are concerned and that is the very reason the insurgents and terrorists are fighting so hard to turn the tide of the Iraqi people themselves…

Larijani said that “countries that want security and stability in the region have no choice but to support Iraq’s elected government.”

And the gentleman from Iran may well be correct but until Iran itself steps up and makes serious peace overture, no one is going to take his rhetoric seriously…

The bottom line for Iran is put up, shut up and play by the rules, otherwise, they aren’t part of the solution, they are part of the problem

Full Story Here:
Iraq Leader Warns Iran on Attacks Abroad

Democrats: U.S. Has Lost Global Standing

Saturday, April 28th, 2007

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) - The United States has lost its global standing during George W. Bush’s presidency and needs a Democratic commander in chief to restore America’s place in the world, Democrats running for the White House said Saturday.

In MY opinion, half of that paragraph is glaringly correct, the U.S. has lost it’s global standing and to a large degree, much respect from other nations of the world, and it is because of the way the war in Iraq was conducted under the stewardship of Pres. Bush but I believe the 2nd half of that paragraph was dictated after the speaker took a huge drink of DNC punch

What the hell is a Democratic president going to do to restore our proper level of respect?? Break bad on Iraq and get this thing done right?? Yeah, sure they are…

“What their perception is that America is a bully and we only care about our short-term interests,” Edwards said. “The starting place is to end the bleeding sore that is the war in Iraq.”

There ya go Johnny Boy, label us, not the radical insurgents that are going to keep on attacking everything in Iraq for as long as we’re there, and will take over Iraq the minute we leave, yeah Johnny, take their side of this thing…

You want to “end the bleeding sore that is the war in Iraq.”?? Cauterize it, in other words, light the fires of a REAL fight and get the job done, but that’s not going to happen, and ya know why?? Because YOU, none of your Dem buddies or George W. Bush have the BALLS to make it happen, that’s why…

“The American people are looking for us as Democrats,” said Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “They’re looking for someone literally, not figuratively, to restore America’s place in the world.”

You’re right Joe, Americans ARE looking for someone that can restore the American prestige that has been lost under the Bush administration, but it’s not you either, or your band of Democratic loons

What this nation needs, and must have if we ever expect to return to any position of world respect, is a man of the caliber of Tom Tancredo, Fred Thompson or Duncan Hunter, or a combination OF that trio, it’s going to take true CONSERVATIVES to rebuild this nation, not some mental midget taking off half cocked in an effort to impress his Daddy, or a ‘Breck’ model that hasn’t got a clue…

Full Story Here:
Democrats: U.S. Has Lost Global Standing

C.I.A. Held al-Qaeda Leader in Secret Jail for Months

Saturday, April 28th, 2007

WASHINGTON, April 27 — The Central Intelligence Agency held a captured Qaeda leader in a secret prison since last fall and transferred him last week to the American military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, officials said Friday.

Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, an Iraqi Kurd who is said to have joined Al Qaeda in the late 1990s and ascended to become a top aide to Osama bin Laden, is the first terrorism suspect known to have been held in secret C.I.A. jails since President Bush announced the transfer of 14 captives to Guantanamo Bay last September.

I have no idea WHY the MSM and every human rights group all over the world have a problem with the CIA having ’secret’ jails or prisons, their existence, and use, is something I take no issue with and I applaud Mr. Bush for allowing them to exist, in fact, I would encourage him to use them more in the future and also consider telling the ‘human rights’ nut-jobs to pound sand, these guys are enemies of our nation, they want to kill us, not just our troops on a field of battle, they want to kill us, you and me, and our friends and families, in horrendous acts of terror right here on American soil, their so-called rights should be less than nothing…

Mr. Iraqi’s case suggests that the C.I.A. may have adopted a new model for handling prisoners held secretly — a practice that Mr. Bush said could resume and that Congress permitted when it passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006.

Well, as Mr. Bush has said himself, there’s gotta be a change in the way things are done, and we have got to allow our Intel services the opportunity to conduct their jobs in an efficient manner, one that will allow them to harvest viable information from those they detain…

Last fall, Mr. Bush declared the agency’s interrogations “one of the most successful intelligence efforts in American history.” But its secret detention of terrorism suspects has been widely criticized by human rights organizations and foreign governments as a violation of international law that relied on interrogation methods verging on torture.

My suggestion to all concerned would be to keep the operation a secret, keep it out of the MSM and plug the leak with the bloody remains of whoever it is leaking to the MSM, unless of course the leaks are intended and are serving a purpose…

And that is a distinct possibility…

You can read this article in it’s entirety here:
C.I.A. Held Qaeda Leader in Secret Jail for Months

PETA Asks AP to Refer to Animals as ‘He’ and ‘She’

Saturday, April 28th, 2007

PETA — those People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals — has a message for the editors at the Associated Press:

Fido’s a “he,” not an “it.”The organization, known worldwide for championing animal rights, is now taking its campaign to the written word, calling on Norm Goldstein, editor of The Associated Press Stylebook, to revise its guidelines, which currently characterize animals as inanimate objects.

In a letter written to Goldstein, the animal activists ask the AP to “take a progressive step and give animals the respect that they deserve by revising AP style guidelines to reflect the usage of personal pronouns for all animals.”

Anna West, the group’s director of communications, pointed out to Goldstein that “the American legal system recognized that nonhuman animals deserve legal status beyond that of mere ‘property’ and that abusive treatment of animals is more than simple vandalism.”

No word on whether the AP also was asked to refer to Spot in second reference as Mr. Spot.

SOURCE:
PETA Asks AP to Refer to Animals as ‘He’ and ‘She’

Ya know, there’s just some organizations that beg to be made fun of, and PETA is one of them…

Even USA Today takes a swipe at the moonbat PETA idiots with their very last line of this story: “No word on whether the AP also was asked to refer to Spot in second reference as Mr. Spot.” and quite frankly, I think that’s hilarious…

I seriously have to ask this question, if the AP does acquiesce to PETA’s request, will Spot notice the gender specific correctness in his name reference when he reads the morning news??

I am a proud, life-long, due paying, card carrying member of PETA, and my family has always supported PETA, but the PETA we belong to is People Eating Tasty Animals, in fact, as I type this, I’m eating some really tasty pig, sausage and biscuits…

So remember folks, there’s always plenty of room on the plate for all of God’s creatures, cooked medium/medium well, served with a baked potato, some Ranch Style beans, a salad and your beverage of choice…

Bon appétit…

Army Officer Criticizes Generals on Iraq

Friday, April 27th, 2007

BAGHDAD (AP) - An active duty U.S. Army officer warns the United States faces the prospect of defeat in Iraq, blaming American generals for failing to prepare their forces for an insurgency and misleading Congress about the situation here.

“For reasons that are not yet clear, America’s general officer corps underestimated the strength of the enemy, overestimated the capabilities of Iraq’s government and security forces, and failed to provide Congress with an accurate assessment of security conditions in Iraq,” Lt. Col. Paul Yingling said in the article published Friday in the Armed Forces Journal.

Several retired generals have made similar comments, but such public criticism from an active duty officer is rare. It suggests that misgivings about the conduct of the Iraq war are widespread in the officer corps at a critical time in the troubled U.S. military mission here.U.S. spokesman Lt. Col. Christopher Garver said Yingling was expressing “his personal opinions in a professional journal” and the military was focused on “executing the mission at hand.”

Yingling served as deputy commander of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment. He has served two tours in Iraq, another in Bosnia and a fourth in Iraq’s Operation Desert Storm in 1991. He attended the Army’s elite School for Advanced Military Studies and has written for one of the Army’s top professional journals, Military Review.

Full Story Here:
Army Officer Criticizes Generals on Iraq

The 1st rule of career advancement: Thou shalt not criticize the POTUS or Sec/Def, no matter how wrong they are…

Yingling also broke the 2nd cardinal rule of career advancement: Thou shalt not criticize any commanding General even if that General IS an idiot…

Lt. Col. Paul Yingling just committed career suicide, in the interest of speaking the truth and telling it like it really is, he has sacrificed HIS career, you see, speaking the truth isn’t real popular anymore, not among many of our fellow bloggers, the current administration, the DoD and most supporters of the war in Iraq…

As the article says, “several retired generals have made similar comments, but such public criticism from an active duty officer is rare.” and that is the truth, in every sense of the word, and the reason is, many in the officer corps today are only concerned with one thing, and that is their career and how to advance it…

I am personally of the opinion that Lt. Col. Yingling either reads my blog and fashions his opinion after mine, or, God forbid, I have been right in MY accusations all along and my opinion is shared by people that aren’t blinded by politics, and have opinions that are formed by a real and sincere concern for what’s right for the USA and our troops, not the kissing of the presidents ass… Imagine that…

Or, Yingling could just be a moonbat anti-war traitor to the USA, I’m sure there’s a few on the FAR right that are already offering up that possibility, it seems like any opposing opinion garners that exact response from the FAR right and the ‘Bush Bot’ crowd, I know I have had a few of the FAR right accuse me of such nonsense…

Well, it may make me highly unpopular for saying this, but some folks need to open their eyes and take an objective look at what these retired Generals and folks like Lt. Col. Yingling are saying and not rely so much on the observations of the FOBBITS that never leave the wire and their wives that have never been there…

Saudis Arrest 172 Militants in Plot

Friday, April 27th, 2007

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) - Police arrested 172 Islamic militants, some of whom had trained abroad as pilots so they could fly aircraft in attacks on Saudi Arabia’s oil fields, the Interior Ministry said Friday. A spokesman said all that remained in the plot “was to set the zero hour.”

The ministry issued a statement saying the detainees were planning to carry out suicide attacks against “public figures, oil facilities, refineries … and military zones” - some of which were outside the kingdom.

“They had reached an advance stage of readiness and what remained only was to set the zero hour for their attacks,” Interior Ministry spokesman Brig. Mansour al-Turki told the Associated Press in a phone call. “They had the personnel, the money, the arms. Almost all the elements for terror attacks were complete except for setting the zero hour for the attacks.”

The ministry did not say the militants would fly aircraft into oil refineries, as the Sept. 11, 2001 hijackers flew planes into buildings in New York and Washington, but it said in a statement that some detainees had been “sent to other countries to study flying in preparation for using them to carry out terrorist attacks inside the kingdom.”

Full Story Here:
Saudis Arrest 172 Militants in Plot

And another segment in the continuing saga, ‘As the Worm Turns’…

Nearly all of the 9-11 terrorists that struck the USA were of Saudi decent if I am not terribly mistaken, and that has led to the belief by many, myself included, that the Saudis had a fairly big role IN the attacks of 9-11, covert involvement, but involvement none the less…

It’s possible that the Saudis didn’t have the involvement with 9-11 that some of us have suspected or, it’s possible the Saudis have pissed off the more radical of their brethren, with moonbat terrorists, you never know, but in any case, the Saudis have shown us all what a strike against terrorism looks like, and it didn’t resemble a ’surge’, it looked like a ’sweep’, and maybe that’s what needs to happen in Iraq, sweep up the trash and get rid of it…

And you can bet that the Saudis won’t mollycoddle anyone that threatens their nation, they don’t play PC bullshit, they execute criminals, readily, and often…

Whether the Saudis are truly our friends or not is a question I don’t have a definitive answer to, our president seems to think so but I am not convinced, but I do think this story bears watching, I want to see exactly how the Saudis handle this threat, how open and honest they are in their prosecution of these people…