The TexasFred Blog
News Opinion Commentary

America’s Rich Muslim Heritage

May 8th, 2010 . by TexasFred

America’s Rich Muslim Heritage

Author unknown:

Barack Obama, in his Cairo speech, said: “I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America ‘s story.”

Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed? Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.

Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.

Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution?

Declaration of Independence?

Bill of Rights?

Didn’t think so.

Did Muslims fight for this country’s freedom from England ? No.

Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America ? No, they did not. In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery. Your own half brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as “pug nosed slaves.” Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family’s “rich Islamic heritage,” doesn’t it Mr. Obama?

Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country? Not present.

There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.

Where were Muslims during this country’s Woman’s Suffrage era? Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture. So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the ‘hajib’ or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. Yep, the Muslims are all for women’s rights, aren’t they?

Where were Muslims during World War II? They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi’s in killing Jews.

Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001? If they weren’t flying planes into the World Trade Center , the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East . No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day. Strangely, the very “moderate” Muslims who’s asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo , Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.

And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the “rich heritage” Muslims have here in America .

Oh, I’m sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslim.

And now we can add November 5, 2009 - the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan.

That, Mr. Obama is the “Muslim heritage” in America.

Proudly Stolen From:
Seaspook’s Rants

Pretty well sums up Muslims in America, their attitude, their uselessness, and gives us a really excellent example of how un-American our stealth Muslim, poser of a POTUS truly is doesn’t it?

Let me make this crystal clear for those that may read this that don’t know the real ME.

I detest Muslims. I detest Islam. I detest anyone that supports Islam and it’s pedophile faux god.

I am firmly convinced that Islam, and all that follow it, are evil incarnate.

I didn’t declare war on Islam.

Islam, and it’s followers declared war on freedom. Islam and it’s followers have sworn to kill any that will not submit TO it and it’s faux prophet.

Read the rest of this entry »


Bookmark and Share


Return: Top of Home Page

Taking Terrorism Seriously

March 30th, 2010 . by TexasFred

Alan Caruba is one of the best Conservative writers I have ever seen. He writes with style, he writes responsibly and he speaks the truth in ALL matters.

Read his work regularly here: Warning Signs

Taking Terrorism Seriously

By Alan Caruba

I keep wondering when the world is going to begin to take Islamic terrorism seriously.

The world’s leaders and, in particular, the media could begin by calling it “Islamic�? or “Muslim�? terrorism. The media were, of course, thrilled to discover that America had a small band of homegrown nut cases, a Christian militia arrested before they did some serious harm. That’s the kind of thing that happens when the president and the government begins to be regarded as the anti-Christ.

I liked Vladimir Putin’s response to the Moscow bombings. He said of those responsible, “We will destroy them.�?

The suicide bombers in Moscow will no doubt be identified—there was video of their entering the station—and an efficient national security apparatus will find out who they are, who their family is, who their friends are, and invite them in for some interrogation. They are not likely to be read Miranda rights, nor will their lawyers be present.

The reason for this is that they are potentially all terrorists.
America has been devoted to treating the terrorists we captured on the battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq as humanely as possible. Those incarcerated at Guantanamo were given copies of the Koran, their dietary laws were observed, ACLU and other lawyers were permitted access to advise them of their “rights.�? Under the Geneva Convention, however, they are exempt from the rules of war and have no rights as combatants.

The Attorney General of the United States of America, a former resident of La-La Land, didn’t think it was the least bit odd to suggest trying Khalid Sheik Muhammad, the 9/11 mastermind, in a civil court in the heart of New York City.

Any number of the Gitmo detainees have been returned to their homelands and have since turned up on the battlefield again. This suggests we do not take terrorists seriously. These are, after all, people who cut the heads off of other people.

Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security has an odd notion of who poses a threat to the nation. They identified “right-wing extremists�? as their primary concern, particularly those who express concern about the central government’s expansion, opponents of abortion, opponents of illegal immigration, and “disgruntled�? veterans returning from the battlefront. No mention of left-wing extremists.

The first rule of war is “know your enemy.�? In the space of a decade, they have shown up in New York, London, Madrid, Bali, Mumbai, and in Moscow; all killing civilians indiscriminately on buses, on trains, in subways, in skyscrapers, and at resorts. Before that, they devoted themselves to kidnapping Americans in Lebanon and blowing up two of our embassies in Africa.

From the streets of Paris where Muslims rioted at will to Malmo, Sweden where attacks on local Jews are driving them to leave the country, the story is always the same. Wherever Muslims become a sufficient number of the population, they begin to make demands, harass the locals, and in the Netherlands to murder an outspoken opponent of Islam in broad daylight. The Dutch response has been to put on trial a man who is warning of these dangers.

The British cannot accommodate them enough, while the French have decided it is far better to be French than Muslim, passing several laws to protect their cultural traditions and society.

The impact on Americans has mostly been to turn a trip to the airport into a complete nightmare, but few other restrictions have interfered with their normal activities. Despite valiant efforts by our border patrol, our southern border goes largely unprotected. The insane murder rate from the drug wars in Mexico will arrive any day now in the U.S.A.

The small U.S. Muslim population has been free of harassment, but the organizations claiming to speak for them have all been identified as having links to the Muslim Brotherhood and related jihadist organizations.

Who takes the jihadists, the terrorists seriously? Saudi Arabia where they just rounded up a large ring of al Qaeda conspirators, Pakistan where they have finally begun to hammer the jihadis in Waziristan and other frontier provinces, and just about every nation with a Muslim majority.

Read the rest of this entry »


Bookmark and Share


Return: Top of Home Page

Suicide bombers kill 37 in Moscow’s subway

March 29th, 2010 . by TexasFred

Suicide bombers kill 37 in Moscow’s subway

MOSCOW - Two female suicide bombers blew themselves up on Moscow’s subway system as it was jam-packed with rush-hour passengers Monday, killing at least 37 people, officials said.

Witnesses described panic at two stations, with commuters falling over each other in dense smoke and dust as they tried to escape the worst attack on the Russian capital in six years.

The head of Russia’s main security agency said preliminary investigation places the blame on rebels from the restive Caucasus region that includes Chechnya, where separatists have fought Russian forces since the mid-1990s. Alexander Bortnikov, head of the FSB, told President Dmitry Medvedev the bombs were filled with bolts and iron rods.

Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who built much of his political capital by directing a fierce war with Chechen separatists a decade ago, vowed that “terrorists will be destroyed.”

Full Story Here:
Suicide bombers kill 37 in Moscow’s subway

Russia is thought to be one of the two most repressive, security conscious nations on earth. This 1st blast was beneath the headquarters of the FSB, that’s the NEW name for the KGB for those not in the know. Talk about taking a stab at the heart of the matter!

In the wake of the explosions, New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority announced a “heightened security presence,” NBC News reported.

Isn’t that a bit like closing the barn door after the horse is out?

We’re NOT a repressive society. We are America, the land of the FREE and the home of Political Correctness. That said, tell me exactly HOW the NYC transportation people are going to spot, and stop, potential suicide bombers in the New York subway system?

Can they stop anyone that looks like an Arab? No, that won’t work, it’s not PC. Can they ask anyone that looks Arab, ‘say, are YOU a Muslim terrorist?’ No, that won’t work either, religious freedom being all that it is. How about this? Stop all women dressed in burkas and strip search them? Uh, no, I’m sure there’s a sexist approach in that suggestion, not to mention profiling and at least some sort of religious persecution.

All that personal and religious freedom that we enjoy here in the good old USA is tough pill to swallow when American lives are in danger huh? I guess that’s what we get for being the melting pot of the world. People can wear their native dress and have a right not to be questioned about it.

But let’s face facts. Our soldiers are being forced to fight a politically correct war in Afghanistan. I can’t see how that could be an event that is even possible, but it’s a reality that IS happening, and it’s getting American troops killed.

Our Muslim loving president has said that WE are not at war with Islam, yet Islamic warriors are the ones committing these attacks, in Russia, and other parts of the world. But our Muslim loving president doesn’t want to offend his TRUE faith, Islam.

So, there is no way that we in the USA can defend against terror attacks, not without going against the wishes of Barry Soetoro, aka; Barack Hussein Obama. An individual that is believed by many to actually BE a Muslim, and a sympathizer to Muslims causes and acts of violence as well as a radical takeover of this nation.

Again, let’s face facts. Enforcement is arbitrary on the Federal level. It’s OK to arrest a group of Christian militia members that present a threat, but NO NO NO, don’t go after a Muslim group, we might offend Barry Soetoro’s homies!

WASHINGTON (AP) - Nine suspects tied to a Christian militia in the Midwest are charged with conspiring to kill police officers, then attack a funeral in the hopes of killing more law enforcement people, federal prosecutors said Monday.

Members of the group called Hutaree are charged in the case, including their leader, David Brian Stone.

Once other officers gathered for the slain officer’s funeral, the group planned to detonate homemade bombs at the funeral, killing more, according to newly unsealed court papers. SOURCE

Read the rest of this entry »


Bookmark and Share


Return: Top of Home Page

« Previous Entries Next Entries »