NATO strike kills Gadhafi’s son but leader escapes

NATO strike kills Gadhafi’s son but leader escapes

TRIPOLI, Libya (AP) - A NATO missile struck a house in Tripoli where Moammar Gadhafi and his wife were staying on Saturday, missing the Libyan leader but killing his youngest son and three grandchildren, a government spokesman said.

Seif al-Arab Gadhafi was the sixth son of Gadhafi and brother of the better known Seif al-Islam Gadhafi. The younger Gadhafi had spent much of his time in Germany in recent years.

Moammar Gadhafi and his wife were in the Tripoli house of his 29-year-old son, Seif al-Arab Gadhafi, when it was hit by at least one bomb dropped from a NATO warplane, according to Libyan spokesman Moussa Ibrahim.

“The leader himself is in good health,” Ibrahim said. “He was not harmed. The wife is also in good health.”

Full Story Here:
NATO strike kills Gadhafi’s son but leader escapes

Well, this is the type of thing that happens when you go to WAR. Oh, wait, we’re not at WAR, this is a kinetic military action. So, that poses this question, what in the HELL is a kinetic military action?

Definition of KINETIC
1: of or relating to the motion of material bodies and the forces and energy associated therewith
2a : active, lively
b : dynamic, energizing
3: of or relating to kinetic art

All I can figure out is, maybe that motion of material bodies and the forces and energy associated therewith in the definition refers to the bodies that are flying through the air when the air strikes occur, maybe? 😕

On Tuesday, British Defense Minister Liam Fox and U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates told reporters at the Pentagon that that NATO planes were not targeting Gadhafi specifically but would continue to attack his command centers.

Because we ALL know that it’s not politically correct, it’s not a nice thing to do nor is it LEGAL to target foreign leaders for assassination. This had to have a been an *Oh crap, we missed* moment. Right?

Can you imagine the outcry from the American LEFT if this had happened under the administration of George W. Bush? Oh, wait, it DID happen, the circumstances were a bit different, but Saddam Hussein’s sons, Uday and Qusay Hussein were killed by U.S. troops in the northern city of Mosul after a tipster betrayed their hideout. The American LEFT was outraged. Oops…

Executive Order 12333

No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination.

So, now we all know, it must have been an *Oops*, an accident, an inadvertent event that incurred destruction and caused some degree of collateral damage with unintended and unintentional consequences, resulting in the death of innocent civilians.

In other words, it was an ACT OF WAR!

Well, it would be called an Act of War if we had a President that was in possession of a set of BALLS!

But since it’s all happening under the administration of The Obamessiah, the LEFT won’t say a word, they will just sit back in a big old pile of hypocrisy and let *Boy Blunder* proceed, unimpeded, to his next financial conquest of the American taxpayer as he uses his position to destroy the United States of America.

“The attack resulted in the martyrdom of brother Seif al-Arab Gadhafi, 29, and three of the leader’s grandchildren,” Ibrahim said.

Seif al-Arab “was playing and talking with his father and mother and his nieces and nephews and other visitors when he was attacked for no crimes committed,” Ibrahim said.

Journalists taken to the walled complex of one-story buildings in a residential Tripoli neighborhood saw heavy bomb damage. The blast had torn down the ceiling of one building and left a huge pile of rubble and twisted metal on the ground.

Do you suppose that ANYONE has thought of the consequences of this action?

I have harped on this since we went into Afghanistan and Iraq, we are not fighting a war against an enemy that we can touch, we are fighting an ideology, we are fighting a religion, well, THEY call it a religion.

The people that we fight welcome death. They know only one way to live, and that is in submission to Islam and in swearing death to those that don’t. Their ultimate reward is to DIE serving Islam.

They only understand one thing, total domination. There are no Rules of War in Islam, there are no Rules of Engagement, those are OUR weakness, we have mercy on our enemy, we have compassion for them and their families.

This killing of Gadhafi’s son, whether intentional or not, is only going to inspire the Warriors of Islam. They will stop fighting and killing each other so they can band together and kill the Infidel, that would be US.

We have seen it before, in Iraq and Afghanistan, and we will see it in Libya. We may see it right here on American soil. Muslim rage knows no bounds, and they will extract their revenge, as long as so much as one of them lives, they will try to make us pay for any wrong they feel that WE have committed.

Digg ThisShare on Facebook+1Share on LinkedInSubmit to StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on Twitter Share
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

This entry was posted in America 1st and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to NATO strike kills Gadhafi’s son but leader escapes

  1. Robert says:

    Yep, the enemy lives to be martyred and if we had a POTUS with some nuts they would be. There is only one thing these ignorant goat fu**ers understand is strength.

    There is only one way you defeat the 7th century mentality and that is to be more brutal than they are. When a terrorist kills an American, and we can pin point what group and who led/participated in it. We wipe out their entire blood line. An attack comes from a Mosque, we wait till it’s full and then blow the F**R off the map. If a rocket comes from an area, the area becomes a kill zone with nothing in it to hide behind.

    We need a Patton, instead we have a Pipi Longstocking.

  2. MissBeth says:

    If I remember correctly, didn’t we end up killing one of Kadafi’s daughter’s last time-when Reagan was in office? And didn’t that pretty much end it then for Kadafi?

  3. R. P. says:

    Good, F-K him and his family.

  4. The Flag Man says:

    Robert has the right idea . Take out the whole blood line. Hell, not only the blood line but the whole dam village he/she came from. Yes, we surely do need a Patton.
    One that’s not afraid to say F**K with us again and we’ll arrange for the whole dam country to meet allah, ……AND FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THE THREAT!!!!!!. Who cares what china or russia or the PC crowd thinks about it. It’d be over by the time they start to complain and besides that, we would be doing them a favor although they wouldn’t admit it.

  5. Always On Watch says:

    Yep, the Sons of Allah are going to turn their attention to killing infidels in retaliation.

    Europe has reason to worry first because of Europe’s geographical proximity.

    Why the United States is spending money from the taxpayers’ coffers to attack Libya is beyond me. On even the simplest level, it should be clear to every American that such monies should be spent to help people here in the States, most recently in Alabama, which was hit by that rash of devastating tornadoes.

  6. Steve Dennis says:

    THe double standard is on full display here; the left is going to remain silent about this but we know what would he happening if this were a Republican candidate. Oh, by the way, I thought removing Ghadafi was not a goal of this mission, isn’t that what we were told?

  7. mrchuck says:

    Just where does one find 72 virgins??
    I guess you gotta go down to the 3rd Grade these days.

  8. minuteman26 says:

    If you don’t succeed, try try again. A POTUS who is a patriot and has balls would repeal EO 12333. That alone would put some manners on numerous heads of state. I come from an era where assination was one of the tools of the trade. Can be a very good thing.

  9. Rich Timm says:

    Here is how you beat the muslo-maniacs at their own game.

    There are no rules in warfare. You engage the threat by any & all means possible until it is no longer a threat.

    Also here are some tips to “engage” enemines at their own game. Have fun w/ these.

    http://stopshouting.blogspot.com/2011/04/ten-rules-for-liberty-guerillas.html

    TEN RULES FOR LIBERTY GUERRILLAS:

    1. It is important to maintain a belief in final victory. Morale is everything.

    2. Large numbers of [counter propaganda] appearing day after day, night after night, everywhere, will make the Regime nervous and raise the self-confidence of the population since such activities demonstrate the inefficiency of the existing Regime and the power and strength of the resistance movement.

    3. Whenever practical, successful guerrilla forces use non-electronic means to communicate.

    4. It is a principle of political science that it is easier to persuade people to vote against something or someone than to persuade them to vote in favor of something.

    5. Liberty guerrillas form centers of resistance EVERYWHERE and they are always in action. Thus, when the Regime attempts to confront/solve one “media” crisis of anti-Regime opinion, another flares up. This serves to also drain the Regime’s manpower and resources.

    6. Always, always, ALWAYS be on the offensive.

    7. Short, snappy slogans spread the message. Advertising/marketing gurus know that to gain traction, a slogan must be 7 words or less.

    “BE ALL THAT YOU CAN BE”.

    Turn the tables on the opposition: Palin’s “Obama: WTF indeed” is classic.

    8. Mix it up. Never be predictable. But always be lawful.

    9. Undermine the Regime’s morale and their propaganda by exposing their methods and by constant emphasis on the unjustness of their cause and effects on the population.
    (Higher prices? Thanks, Obama).

    10. Exploit the alternative media to communicate the ideas of the Liberty movement and resistance to the Regime. Be everywhere; be informed; make it known you are aware of the lies disseminated by the Regime and aren’t falling for them.

    THE MOMENTUM IS ON OUR SIDE. Do not be deterred!

  10. TexasFred says:

    From the *I told you so* department…

    Vandals attack embassies in Libya after airstrike

    TRIPOLI, Libya (AP) - Vandals attacked the Italian and British embassies in the Libyan capital Sunday, hours after officials said Moammar Gadhafi escaped a NATO missile strike that killed one of his sons and three young grandchildren. The unrest prompted the United Nations to pull its international staff out of Tripoli.

    Britain responded to the attack on its embassy complex, which left the buildings badly burned, by announcing that it was expelling the Libyan ambassador to London.

    Full Story Here:
    Vandals attack embassies in Libya after airstrike

    Going to lick the Libyan ambassador out huh? Yeah, that’ll show ’em…

    Every day that goes by, I have less respect for Great Britain than I did the last…

Comments are closed.