Worse Than Watergate!

This is a post made by my good friend J.D. Longstreet and his original post can be read here: Worse Than Watergate!.

Worse Than Watergate!
A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet

LongstreetFour Americans are dead and the American people are being lied to as to how and why they got that way.

Either the President is lying - and needs to be impeached, or he’s NOT lying — and needs to be impeached — because he DIDN’T know what was happening!

Repeat: Four Americans are DEAD. And as much as it pains me to say it — it doesn’t look as if our government made a genuine effort to save them.

I have watched, listened, and read as much as we have been allowed to know — plus — information gleaned by non-mainstream media sources, and I concluded — long ago — that there is a major cover-up at the top levels of the US government over the incident in Benghazi.

Now, let me be clear: I am not an investigative reporter. That is not what I do. I am a commentator — an opinion writer … nothing more. I have deliberately “hung back” on any in-depth comments on the Benghazi affair simply because there always seemed to me to be more THERE there. In other words, it was obvious, at least to me, that we were only getting drips and drabs of what really happened and, I felt (and still do) that we have been told nothing of WHY it happened. But, dear reader, even Helen Keller could see there is a major cover-up surrounding the incident in Benghazi!

That CIA “safe-house” has troubled me from the very beginning of this horrible story. What was the CIA doing there? There was no embassy in Benghazi. In fact, the building attacked was not even a consulate. If anything, it was a “mission.” Had it been an embassy, I’d not question a CIA presence. They are practically a part of the furniture in any US Embassy. But, as I said, this was NOT an embassy.

Remember too, the last person our ambassador met with the evening of the attack was a Turkish diplomat. What was a Turkish diplomat doing in Benghazi, Libya, meeting with Ambassador Stevens at an unprotected site? Why not meet in the embassy in Tripoli?

It now seems that the ex-SEALS were not attached to the consulate, but were assigned to the CIA “safe-house.” They (laudably) went against orders and made a rescue attempt of the US officials and staff at the consulate/mission — and lost their lives in the attempt.

There was quickly a fog of misinformation spewed up and out by the Obama Administration in what — in my opinion — is an attempt to cover-up an on-going scheme/operation to smuggle weapons into Syria through Turkey.

A few weeks ago, there was a report that Libyan militia members had been ordered to turn-in the weapons that had been supplied them in their struggle to overthrow Qaddafi. That report confirmed that many of those weapons had been turned in. Where did those weapons go? Perhaps, to the Syrian rebels?

It has been suspected for some time now that the US has been supplying small arms to the rebels in Syria for a while — even though the Obama Administration denies it.

It is the kind of operation the CIA would be up-to-their-necks in and it would explain their presence on the ground in Libya in a safe-house just a mile away from the consulate/mission.

For the sake of argument, suppose the guns gathered from the Libyan militia were being covertly sent to Turkey and then smuggled across the Turkey/Syrian border to the Syrian rebels.

I continue to cycle back to the question — WHY was the Ambassador THERE , alone, without a security detail, at that particular time, meeting with a high Turkish diplomat. Remember, this was on September 11th. If there was going to be an attack by terrorists — September 11th would be the day for it.

Now, I’m just hypothesizing here. I have no idea, at this point, what was really going on. But, I am confident there was a covert operation underway — one so black that sacrificing the lives of four Americans was deemed “worth it” by our leaders in Washington.

For whatever reason, the Obama Administration has chosen to tell the world a bald-faced lie about what happened in Benghazi.

So politicians lie, right? Yeah, they do. But this time — four Americans are dead and the country wants to know why that happened and why the Obama Administration chose to lie to us about it.

It is clear now, that all the warnings from the political right about the penchant of this President and his administration for lies was absolutely correct. If they are lying about the “Incident in Benghazi,” what else are they lying about?

It is clear the Mainstream Media is NOT going to cover this story. They are not going to investigate what happened for fear that it will drive down support for Obama. They seem to have taken the attitude: the truth, the welfare of the country, be damned. Keeping their man, Obama, afloat is the most important thing, bar none. Nothing can be allowed to interfere — not even the truth!

Look. The cover-up of “Benghazigate” is far more important that Watergate ever was!

We need a “Congressional Investigation” of the incident at Benghazi and we need it post haste! If ever an incident deserved investigating by the Congress this horrible event in Benghazi is it. Too, it is looking more and more as if grounds for impeachment proceedings are present.

Whistle blowers, witnesses who claim to know the truth, are standing by having already stated their willingness to testify before Congress, but they are enjoined from such as a result of having signed documents that prevent them from discussing the event(s) in Benghazi. They need to be released from those bonds so we can get to the truth. One phone call from the President would take care of it. Will he make the call? Don’t hold your breath.

Yes, if only Obama was a republican, there would be no need for commentators to be begging the Congress to investigate or opining at the reluctance of the MsM to investigate.

It is what it is. The Mainstream Media in America is an organ of the political left — as is President Obama. There is simply no way we are going to get anything approaching impartial reporting or a REAL investigation of Benghazigate from the MsM.

For me, it is not just a matter of trust, it is a matter of honor — NATIONAL HONOR.

America deserves better than we have gotten, or, are likely to get from Obama.

© J. D. Longstreet

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

This entry was posted in J.D. Longstreet and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Worse Than Watergate!

  1. OregonBuzz says:

    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”. - Joseph Goebbels, Minister of Nazi Propaganda

  2. Hgpsurf says:

    These are sad times indeed for this country. The country is led by a lying man who hates America (while pretending to defend it and it’s Constitution) and a media that is in bed with him. More than half of the citizens but into this crap and if this continues I don’t see how this great country will survive. The Left is getting bolder by the day and is much more vocal and confident than it has ever been.

  3. mrchuck says:

    These were Muslims that killed our men.
    Obama is a certified Muslim, and will “stand with the Muslims if things turn bad”.
    Obama said this in his book.
    So don’t get your panties in a wad over this.
    This is Obama’s credo, nothing less.
    Wouldn’t it be nice if Obama just “stroked out”.
    His hair is gray, he smokes continuously, loses temper and stature, and is surely a candidate,,, by being married to that female chimp he married, and supposedly had offspring with the she-boon.
    Would not surprise me at all,if Obama was gay, was sterile, has AIDS, and will someday succumb to these illnesses.

    • TexasFred says:

      I have often seen the vein in the side of his temple THROBBING, hard… I thought, “Wow, wouldn’t it make headlines if the POTUS *stroked out* on television?” :twisted:

  4. MissBeth says:

    It seems to me, between Fast and Furious and Benghazi, this administration has a penchant for weapons running. Trouble is, they’re not very good at it and keep getting caught. My question is why are we suddenly in the weapons running business-what is the motivation at the bottom of the well?

    • TexasFred says:

      We have ALWAYS been in the weapons running business, it’s just that *most* administrations hire folks to do it that actually know HOW to get it done right!!

  5. LD Jackson says:

    Sadly, no one in a position to do something is interested in doing that something. It’s a dirty, rotten shame that American lives were lost and only a select few know why it happened. I am not naive about our government and some of the things they do, off the books, but I would like to think it is better than that. I’m just not so sure anymore.

  6. BobF says:

    Excellent article!

    You’ve been able to help me come up with the answer 2 for the 1+1 that’s been kicking around in my head. Something had been in the back of my mind but I couldn’t figure out why. Tyrone Woods, one of the former SEAL’s, supposedly painted targets with a Ground Laser Designator. I couldn’t figure how he just happens to have a GLD. I mean, it’s not something just lying around the armory or the compound. You’ve just explained why a GLD might have been there; arms supplying. Also, if Woods had actually painted a target, that meant a weapons system was overhead capable of launching missiles or computer controlled fire at the target.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>